A field guide from Stephen Hunt’s SFcrowsnest Back to SFcrowsnest
The Steampunk Field Guide emblem The Steampunk Field Guide by Stephen Hunt’s SFcrowsnest

Is This Steampunk?

Verdicts on the borderline cases

The questions the genre argues about most, answered plainly. For each one: why people say yes, why purists say no, and the label we would actually use.

How we judge

We treat “steampunk” as a spectrum, not a passport. A work can be core, proto, adjacent or borderland without anyone needing to lose their temper. The verdict matters less than understanding why.

Is Arcane steampunk?

Sort of

Why people call it steampunk

Piltover’s brass-and-glass invention district, the chem-smog underbelly of Zaun and the whole hextech industrial revolution read as steampunk at a glance.

Why purists may object

Hextech is magic-tech rather than steam, and the world is a video-game fantasy setting rather than an alternate nineteenth century.

Best label: Steampunk-adjacent hextech fantasy

Is Dishonored steampunk?

Yes

Why people call it steampunk

Dunwall runs on whale oil, brass and rivets, with a plague-ridden industrial city and a retro-futurist technology base. It is one of gaming’s richest steampunk worlds.

Why purists may object

There is an overlay of the occult and the Outsider’s magic, which nudges it toward the fantastical end of the spectrum.

Best label: Whale-oil steampunk

Is Fullmetal Alchemist steampunk?

Yes

Why people call it steampunk

Automail prosthetics, an industrial military state and alchemy treated as engineering give it a strong steampunk grammar of brass, machinery and consequence.

Why purists may object

Alchemy is its central magic system, so it sits as much in industrial fantasy as in pure steampunk.

Best label: Core manga steampunk

Is His Dark Materials steampunk?

Sort of

Why people call it steampunk

Lyra’s Oxford runs on anbaric lights, zeppelins and a brass-and-amber alternate technology, with a strongly Victorian-Edwardian texture.

Why purists may object

The heart of the story is metaphysics, daemons and theology, not machinery. The tech is atmosphere rather than subject.

Best label: Steampunk-adjacent alt-history fantasy

Was Jules Verne steampunk?

Not really

Why people call it steampunk

The Nautilus, the great flying machines and the journeys to the centre of the earth gave steampunk almost its entire vocabulary of wondrous Victorian machines.

Why purists may object

Verne was writing contemporary scientific romance, not looking back at the steam age. Steampunk is retro-futurist by definition; Verne was simply futurist.

Best label: Proto-steampunk / scientific romance

Want the full reasoning on any of these? Each verdict links through to the complete field-guide entry, where the “Is it really steampunk?” section makes the longer case.