Why it matters
It shows the weird literary-crossover side of modern steampunk-adjacent fiction, with London remade as a playground of books, power and reptilian royalty.
Lavie Tidhar's The Bookman imagines a London where literary allusion, political violence and a lizard monarchy all appear to have got into the same cab and refused to say who is paying.
The Bookman is the first in Tidhar's linked sequence of gaslamp alternate histories, followed by Camera Obscura and The Great Game. Its London is not a tidy steampunk city of polished machines and punctual airships. It is a literary fever, full of strange rulers, secret histories, political violence and references that have escaped their original novels with suspicious confidence.
The lizard monarchy is the immediately arresting motif. It signals that this is not standard alternate Victoriana. The premise pushes the book toward weird gaslamp fantasy and literary collage, where the altered political order is strange enough to make even seasoned steampunk readers check their tea. That strangeness is the point. Tidhar is not decorating the nineteenth century; he is mutating it.
The Bookman figure and the terrorism motif introduce a darker political thread. This is not just a cameo parade. The book is interested in power, spectacle, radical action and the way stories themselves become dangerous. In a field full of secret societies and imperial conspiracies, Tidhar's approach feels more anarchic and postmodern.
The obvious comparison is Anno Dracula, with its altered Victorian order and literary characters crossing boundaries. But Tidhar's tone is more fragmented and globally aware, less cosy in its relationship to British myth. The Bookman belongs to a later moment when steampunk and gaslamp fiction could interrogate the library as well as raid it.
The literary cameos are therefore more than Easter eggs. They are part of a method. The book treats fiction as political material, not simply nostalgia. When old characters and genres appear in new arrangements, the reader has to ask what those old stories were doing in the first place, and who benefited from their empires, romances and myths.
That gives The Bookman a different charge from many neo-Victorian adventures. It is less interested in making the reader feel comfortably clever for spotting references, and more interested in making the references unstable. The library has become a revolutionary zone. Old books do not sit quietly on shelves; they escape into power, policing, terror and monarchy.
Tidhar's own international background also matters for the field-guide map. The book is not simply another British author rearranging British Victoriana. It belongs to a wider conversation about empire, literature and genre inheritance. That helps push steampunk's London away from cosy national myth and toward a stranger, more contested city.
The terrorism motif should be handled with care. It is not merely a dash of danger. It gives the book a political edge, asking what resistance, spectacle and violence mean inside a fantastical imperial order. That edge places it near gaslamp weirdness and political alternate history rather than simple adventure romp.
Its steampunk fit is adjacent rather than purely mechanical. There are retrofuturist and alternate-history elements, but the central engine is literary, political and weird. That makes the book useful for mapping the field's border with New Weird, gaslamp fantasy and postcolonial alternate history.
Readers who prefer straightforward adventure may find it slippery. Readers who like a book that knows the canon and is not afraid to rearrange it with a crowbar will find much to enjoy. It is a deep cut in the sense that it may not be the first book one hands to a new steampunk reader, but it is valuable once the reader wants stranger London.
Is it really steampunk?
It is steampunk-adjacent gaslamp alternate history rather than core machinery-first steampunk. The Bookman shares the field's historical remixing, Victorian weirdness and speculative London, but its main energy comes from literary collage, political disruption and alternate monarchy rather than industrial technology.
That adjacency matters. Steampunk's borderlands are where the genre argues with itself. Does a work need steam power, or can alternate history and literary weirdness be enough? In this case, the honest label is gaslamp-adjacent, but close enough to the field to deserve a page.
It points readers toward Anno Dracula, The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen, The Steampunk Trilogy and other works where the nineteenth-century library becomes an unstable machine. Tidhar's London may not run on boilers, but it certainly runs on combustible texts.
Readers who enjoy straightforward mechanism may find the book slippery, but slipperiness is part of its function. It belongs to the field's literary borderland, where canon, myth and politics are melted down and recast. That makes it a useful deep cut for anyone who wants steampunk to argue with its own reading list.
Find it
If you would like to track down The Bookman, these search links may help. We have not specified an edition, so you can pick the format that suits you.
Affiliate links: as an Amazon Associate, Stephen Hunt’s SFcrowsnest earns from qualifying purchases. These may earn us a small commission at no extra cost to you.